-
The lawsuit asking the federal court to step in and implement state legislative district maps is on hold until the Ohio Supreme Court takes further action.
-
Members of the Ohio Redistricting Commission are laying out their arguments for why they supported or opposed the latest congressional district map.
-
The four Republicans on the Ohio Redistricting Commission who voted for the latest round of House and Senate district maps are making their argument for why the plan is constitutional.
-
After seeing a flurry of proposed maps and changes to those maps, the Ohio Redistricting Commission adopted a Republican-drawn congressional district plan.
-
The Ohio Supreme Court has continued the contempt hearing it set last week for the members of the Ohio Redistricting Commission.
-
The members of the Ohio Redistricting Commission have been ordered to a hearing on March 1 to explain why they shouldn't be held in contempt, though two justices disagree with holding the hearing.
-
The Ohio Redistricting Commission adopted new Ohio House and Ohio Senate district maps by a vote of 4 to 3, with Auditor Keith Faber (R-Ohio) joining Democratic commissioners in voting against the proposal.
-
Senate President Matt Huffman (R-Lima) says a new set of Ohio House and Ohio Senate district maps could be proposed to the Ohio Redistricting Commission as early as Thursday.
-
The Ohio Supreme Court ordered the commission to file an explanation for why it should not be held in contempt for failing to follow a previous order.
-
The Court wants the commission to show why there shouldn't be a penalty for not passing new House and Senate district maps by the deadline last week.
-
Former Ohio Supreme Court justice Paul Pfeifer says the court has the ability to hold the Ohio Redistricting Commission in contempt of court for not following its order to adopt new state legislative district maps.
-
The Ohio Redistricting Commission is expected to meet later this afternoon to deal with the maps.